Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1039 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4130 - 205 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 91 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74965 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |