Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3683 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $16.76 vs $182.79
- Up to 85% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-13600KF - $0.12 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 69% better in Rust than FX-4130 - 258 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 20 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
15%
Price, €
€202.9
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |