Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $16.76 vs $102.37
- Up to 80% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-11600 - $0.16 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 23% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-4130 - 143 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4529 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
20%
Price, €
€113.63
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4529 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |