Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4130 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4130 is 7 days older than the more expensive Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-3240T - $16.76 vs $18.79
- Up to 14% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-3240T - $0.06 vs $0.07 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13185 minutes ago
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |