Buy on Amazon
€42.22
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2803 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $38.04 vs $102.36
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4130 - 160 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 FX4130 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD4130FRW4MGU FD4130FRGUBOX 3.8GHz 4MB 4 cores
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.