Buy on Amazon
€42.22
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2045 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 3% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $38.04 vs $39.15
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4130 - 155 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 54 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 FX4130 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD4130FRW4MGU FD4130FRGUBOX 3.8GHz 4MB 4 cores
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.