Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1100 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 43% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $16.76 vs $29.18
- Up to 46% better value when playing F1 22 than Celeron G3900 - $0.07 vs $0.13 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than FX-4130 - 256 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 51 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |