Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2871 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $16.76 vs $277.12
- Up to 92% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.11 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 32% better in Dota 2 than FX-4130 - 217 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Buy for €307.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |