Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8150 is 320 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 64% cheaper than FX-8150 - $16.76 vs $46.81
- Up to 64% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8150 - $0.08 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 1% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-4130 - 233 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Buy for €51.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |