Key Differences
In short — FX-4100 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4100 is 326 days older than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Performs up to 0% better in Fortnite than Pentium G645T - 212 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium |
| Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
