Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 932 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Remnant II than FX-4100 - 79 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
