Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i5-4430 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 2257 days newer than Core i5-4430.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4430 - 125 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4430 - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4430
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 84 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-4430 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 84 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |