Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 110 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 225 vs 280 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 128 vs 64 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than EPYC 7742 - 180 vs 169 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1359.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,359.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rome | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 32 |
128 | Threads | 64 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 280 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |