Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 16% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than EPYC 7742 - 248 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 170 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
248
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€315.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €315.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rome | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 12 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 170 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |