Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4170 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4170 is 1155 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than EPYC 7551P - 182 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60958 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Naples | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |