Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2384 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 64 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7551 - 159 vs 122 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€297.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €297.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Naples | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 20 |
64 | Threads | 28 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |