Buy on Amazon
€38.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 1481 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-3250 - 213 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i3-3250 3.50GHz 2 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33250
Buy for €38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65530 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
56.475583864118896%
Multi-Core
1130
19.017165937394818%
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Naples | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.