Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2015 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 54% better in War Thunder than EPYC 7551 - 237 vs 154 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Naples | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
