Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1036 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than EPYC 7551 - 131 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |