Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 874 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Athlon |
| Naples | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
