Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms EPYC 7413 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 234 days newer than EPYC 7413.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7413
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 48 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than EPYC 7413 - 194 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7413 - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7413 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€230.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €230.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7413 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
48 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |