Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms EPYC 7402 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1532 days newer than EPYC 7402.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7402
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900K - 48 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 4 than EPYC 7402 - 348 vs 309 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7402 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
348
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€351.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €351.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7402 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |