Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 1246 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than EPYC 7302P - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 120 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€419.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €419.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Rome | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |