Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1246 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than EPYC 7282 - 289 vs 272 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 16 | Cores | 24 |
| 32 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
