Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 946 days newer than Core i7-7700.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-7700 - 295 vs 294 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
294
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €135.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12965 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |