Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 267 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7282 - 191 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |