Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 292 days newer than Core i5-9400.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-9400 - 184 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
175
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€130.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €130.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |