Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 1545 days newer than Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-5675C - 352 vs 346 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
346
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |