Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 267 days older than Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-10600K - 184 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 95 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €114.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |