Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 106 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than EPYC 7282 - 413 vs 407 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
413
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€46.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €46.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15389 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |