Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 2529 days newer than Core i3-3220.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Core i3-3220 - 188 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 55 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
157
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |