Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 881 days older than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G6900 - 284 vs 281 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
281
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |