Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1248 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 93% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $72.23 vs $1041.95
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Athlon 3000G - 232 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Buy for €1,156.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
81.10169491525424%
Multi-Core
1975
36.04014598540146%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Athlon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |