Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1248 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 57% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $72.23 vs $169.73
- Up to 55% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.62 vs $1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 7% better in FIFA 23 than Athlon 3000G - 138 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
129
93.47826086956522%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1624 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
45.255474452554736%
Price, €
€188.4
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
87.95955882352942%
Multi-Core
1975
50.667008722421755%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Athlon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |