Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $38.36 vs $204.9
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-11900 - $0.24 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 30% better in Rust than Athlon 3000G - 228 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
175
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Buy for €227.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |