Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $38.36 vs $186.45
- Up to 77% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.22 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Far Cry 5 than Athlon 3000G - 219 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
197
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
23%
Price, €
€206.96
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €206.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |