Buy on Amazon
€80.18
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 1906 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $72.23 vs $402.12
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 19% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Athlon 3000G - 89 vs 75 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core, 4-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for €80.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-5930K Processor 3.5GHz 0GT/s 15MB LGA 2011-v3 CPU Only, BX80648I75930K
Buy for €446.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i7-5930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
82.78546712802768%
Multi-Core
1975
36.04014598540146%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell E |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.