Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1510 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $38.36 vs $267.6
- Up to 82% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-14700F - $0.4 vs $2.2 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Alan Wake 2 than Athlon 3000G - 135 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 28 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
106
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Buy for €297.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |