Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $72.23 vs $153.55
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 26% better in F1 23 than Athlon 3000G - 235 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €80.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
59.36724565756823%
Multi-Core
1975
27.312958097082007%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |