Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2019 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 35 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 35% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $46.82 vs $72.23
- Up to 34% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Athlon 3000G - $0.21 vs $0.32 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €80.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5259 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
91.05613701236918%
Multi-Core
1975
67.45218579234972%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |