Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3237 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-2500K - 333 vs 324 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 75% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $18.27 vs $72.23
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €80.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Buy for €20.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
67.50261233019855%
Multi-Core
1921
97.26582278481013%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |