Buy on Amazon
€80.18
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $242
Availability
MSRP in USD: $242
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 1141 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - $72.23 vs $178.01
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-13500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Athlon 3000G - 151 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core, 4-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for €80.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-13500 Desktop Processor 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 24MB Cache, up to 4.8 GHz
Buy for €197.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
39.82521847690387%
Multi-Core
1975
15.997084075814028%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.