Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $72.23 vs $80.42
- Up to 8% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-10600KF - $0.36 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Athlon 3000G - 230 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
220
95.65217391304348%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
92.3076923076923%
Price, €
€89.27
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
56.761565836298935%
Multi-Core
1975
28.963191083736618%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |