Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 776 days newer than the more expensive Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Athlon 3000G - 259 vs 253 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $36.56 vs $72.23
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €80.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
59.70056144728634%
Multi-Core
1975
73.2566765578635%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |