Buy on Amazon
€48.69
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1051 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3930T - 169 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 35% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $28.52 vs $43.86
- Up to 31% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Athlon 3000G - $0.2 vs $0.29 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core, 4-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
157
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
| Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.