Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 446 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $38.36 vs $786.04
- Up to 95% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.63 vs $11.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Athlon 3000G - 74 vs 68 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
68
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
74
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.79/FPS
5%
Price, €
€872.5
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |