Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 580 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $72.23 vs $138.2
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than Athlon 3000G - 172 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Buy for €153.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
76.86746987951807%
Multi-Core
1975
32.3081956486177%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Picasso | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |