Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2584 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in God of War than FX-8300 - 168 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8300 - $43.86 vs $81.91
- Up to 48% better value when playing God of War than FX-8300 - $0.29 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |