Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 602 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $51.17 vs $164.51
- Up to 67% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10900F - $0.35 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Athlon 200GE - 171 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 20 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18579 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
32%
Price, €
€182.61
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |