Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 200GE is 156 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 9% better in War Thunder than Celeron G4900 - 151 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing War Thunder than Celeron G4900 - $0.38 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 3% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $49.74 vs $51.17
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.8
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |